tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-40019956147168506822024-03-05T08:06:32.515-05:00Reagan was RightGiving directions to the 'Shining City on the Hill' since March 2007Reagan Republicanhttp://www.blogger.com/profile/01918657498858395566noreply@blogger.comBlogger37125tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-4001995614716850682.post-48189368703775266422010-01-29T23:19:00.001-05:002010-01-29T23:20:51.762-05:00It's time to renew.Only a fool can sit back and let things happen like they have been without stepping up. I will now step up. OBAMA must be stopped. Its time to take our ideas and offer them to America and et them choose...him or us.Reagan Republicanhttp://www.blogger.com/profile/01918657498858395566noreply@blogger.com0tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-4001995614716850682.post-40472871995450862972008-09-03T08:04:00.003-05:002008-09-03T08:12:12.099-05:00The Truth Hurts...<div align="justify"><a href="https://blogger.googleusercontent.com/img/b/R29vZ2xl/AVvXsEhiErC2XP5bIasD4hPgymv9BfeucS1OFidiSVHBG_j6mimECNV1L4kCJl4j_NNcrg5ADz1de0B6IIY-r8VtkaTNqCtfuztq6sB5m9W6X3VPGoHoChafgGiiQm-A68n_gzGZrbT-QnSXlOw/s1600-h/PalinFamily_Outside_Med.jpg"><img id="BLOGGER_PHOTO_ID_5241781507722359890" style="FLOAT: left; MARGIN: 0px 10px 10px 0px; CURSOR: hand" alt="" src="https://blogger.googleusercontent.com/img/b/R29vZ2xl/AVvXsEhiErC2XP5bIasD4hPgymv9BfeucS1OFidiSVHBG_j6mimECNV1L4kCJl4j_NNcrg5ADz1de0B6IIY-r8VtkaTNqCtfuztq6sB5m9W6X3VPGoHoChafgGiiQm-A68n_gzGZrbT-QnSXlOw/s200/PalinFamily_Outside_Med.jpg" border="0" /></a>One of my good friends who is a liberal, asked me if I was going to buy into the Sarah Palin pick and spread the word. He told me that my future relationship with him depended on my response.<br /><br />I replied to him with this question…”Who has more executive experience, Barak or Sarah?”<br /><br />His response “That is what Hannity says so I knew you would follow suit. Wouldn't that also give her more experience than the top of your ticket?”<br /><br />He then said that due to my response (one sentence), “ We are done…”<br /><br />I tell you that so I can share with you my response to him…</div><div align="justify"><br />__________________________________<br /><br />You did not answer the question. Who has more executive experience, Barak or Sarah?<br /><br />It hurts to answer, doesn't it? It is very hard to answer this question for you. The truth of this question hurts you. <br /><br />Sarah might just be the female version of Clarence Thomas.<br /><br />The liberals hate her because she is a successful, self made, hard working woman who became governor of a state without the need to play the victim or the need for help from a feminist organization. <br /><br />She did it on her own and that scares the hell out of the democrats. She really shows that a woman can be somebody. <br /><br />And the best part is, she reminds most Americans in battleground stats of their mom, sister, friend or themselves. She relates to real Americans. She is not an iconic ideal. She is not full of hope. She is the answer to hope...she is action. She is all about taking responsibility for the course of one's life and doing something with it. She is not waiting around hoping for someone to do it for her. She is doing it. <br /><br />And this scares the democrats so....<br /><br />If the American people realize they don't need someone doing everything for them to succeed, they just might learn how to succeed on their own. And if that happens, the democrats are going to be hoping they survive as a party....<br /><br />Oh and by the way, Palin is a working mother of five, her husband works on an oil rig and is a champion snowmobile racer, and she loves to fish and hunt.<br /><br />Plus she can field dress a moose. (Nod to Fred Thompson)<br /><br />And she's just our VP nominee. She really fits as a VP candidate. (Obama might have fared better as a VP candidate)<br /><br />Our Presidential nominee stacks up pretty well too..<br /><br />I think we can agree to disagree on the issue of Palin. I think Barak has a good shot of becoming president. But the coronation is on hold now since Palin, like her or not, has electrified the base, exposed the media bias toward Obama, and has put the election into a true race.<br /><br />Can't we all just get along?</div>___________________<br /><br />We will see what my friend says.Reagan Republicanhttp://www.blogger.com/profile/01918657498858395566noreply@blogger.com6tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-4001995614716850682.post-61182906315981977632008-09-01T19:33:00.002-05:002008-09-01T19:44:28.079-05:00McCain/Palin 08<a href="https://blogger.googleusercontent.com/img/b/R29vZ2xl/AVvXsEhjeaqN9JvMDO3sDMz5Z0b_irx5oOX1TH_rOzPKNsc4oU4-bfGH4OE7qYwxeNROM4EE5LASqlUXZZDOsBYfVcymFRhGd4Mn22XWM8VARtsEOD22fEeMUR4dmNufYmtCc5hPnYBxtGOVLY4/s1600-h/Palin.jpg"><img id="BLOGGER_PHOTO_ID_5241218403793397410" style="FLOAT: left; MARGIN: 0px 10px 10px 0px; CURSOR: hand" alt="" src="https://blogger.googleusercontent.com/img/b/R29vZ2xl/AVvXsEhjeaqN9JvMDO3sDMz5Z0b_irx5oOX1TH_rOzPKNsc4oU4-bfGH4OE7qYwxeNROM4EE5LASqlUXZZDOsBYfVcymFRhGd4Mn22XWM8VARtsEOD22fEeMUR4dmNufYmtCc5hPnYBxtGOVLY4/s320/Palin.jpg" border="0" /></a><br /><div>Well a lot has changed since February.</div><br /><div></div><br /><div>Hillary has been defeated by the Messiah and McCain has won the nomination. </div><br /><div></div><br /><div>I said I would not vot e for him unless Fred was on the ticket. </div><br /><div></div><br /><div>Well....Now Palin is on the ticket. And she is worth voting for. She was #2 on my dream VP list behind Jindal. And now McCain is currently expousing Reagan ideals and policies. </div><br /><div></div><br /><div>I have no choice but to support the conservative canidate. I will do everything in my power to get McCain/Palin elected. Especially since I want to see a Palin vs. Hillary in 2012.</div>Reagan Republicanhttp://www.blogger.com/profile/01918657498858395566noreply@blogger.com3tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-4001995614716850682.post-91616418695553143522008-02-02T13:12:00.000-05:002008-02-02T13:22:18.594-05:00<a href="https://blogger.googleusercontent.com/img/b/R29vZ2xl/AVvXsEhBT4Ntb9DbkGvSVXYMaH7Hx0b8KsOjVOE5ad286OfQmSrM56bQnszoQvzBXr75FimNxGbPGJGZx6oL5shLCjD8_xDyKmUu69A1gb_gHVWZbzhh7oV8ThiIL4MbSA8NLdXsJOy0aLYShHw/s1600-h/374489576_392aa3e96a_o.jpg"><img id="BLOGGER_PHOTO_ID_5162447421325757218" style="FLOAT: left; MARGIN: 0px 10px 10px 0px; CURSOR: hand" alt="" src="https://blogger.googleusercontent.com/img/b/R29vZ2xl/AVvXsEhBT4Ntb9DbkGvSVXYMaH7Hx0b8KsOjVOE5ad286OfQmSrM56bQnszoQvzBXr75FimNxGbPGJGZx6oL5shLCjD8_xDyKmUu69A1gb_gHVWZbzhh7oV8ThiIL4MbSA8NLdXsJOy0aLYShHw/s320/374489576_392aa3e96a_o.jpg" border="0" /></a>Heaven forbid that John McCain is the nominee. Just a short list of problems.<br /><br />Amnesty for Illegals<br />Gang of 14<br />He was almost John Kerry's VP<br />Gun Control<br />He says Alito is too conservative<br />He has deomcrats who he calls frineds, (Just Kidding, that's not illegal ....yet)<br />He likes Hillary<br />McCain/Fiengold<br /><br />And on and on and on...<br /><br />He would have to make Fred his VP for me to consider voting for him.<br /><br />He is better that an democrat though.Reagan Republicanhttp://www.blogger.com/profile/01918657498858395566noreply@blogger.com0tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-4001995614716850682.post-48152759520175407262008-02-02T12:44:00.000-05:002008-02-02T13:06:01.001-05:00What now?<div align="justify"><a href="https://blogger.googleusercontent.com/img/b/R29vZ2xl/AVvXsEjLkgm8BqhYQDS73ypjkOxBDtV8R-JU57SxBKoorIxpPLpjhzOvlmBmGaQ1Tn-8EJOJJkdusHfndsm8RsmTtZwGYyhLuthmDDXBJNq406EbnZ5NDMJP9dRgxGJKvGY0HlOkf1nRd_oXXcQ/s1600-h/img0309.jpg"><img id="BLOGGER_PHOTO_ID_5162445608849558290" style="FLOAT: left; MARGIN: 0px 10px 10px 0px; CURSOR: hand" alt="" src="https://blogger.googleusercontent.com/img/b/R29vZ2xl/AVvXsEjLkgm8BqhYQDS73ypjkOxBDtV8R-JU57SxBKoorIxpPLpjhzOvlmBmGaQ1Tn-8EJOJJkdusHfndsm8RsmTtZwGYyhLuthmDDXBJNq406EbnZ5NDMJP9dRgxGJKvGY0HlOkf1nRd_oXXcQ/s320/img0309.jpg" border="0" /></a>Fred is now out of the race, sort of. He was done in by the media, the fact that Romney, Huck and Guliani split the conservative vote and by the fact that he would't play the election game.<br /></div><div align="justify"><br /></div><div align="justify">He now must wait for either a brokered convention, which he would be the only logical choice at convention to be the nominee or hope that whoever gets the nod is smart enough to bring him in as VP. </div><div align="justify"><br /></div><div align="justify">I did my part, I got a chance to vote for him. We should all be ashamed that the republican party did not nominate this man...although we may still have our chance.</div>Reagan Republicanhttp://www.blogger.com/profile/01918657498858395566noreply@blogger.com0tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-4001995614716850682.post-27056273643832798712008-01-09T13:47:00.000-05:002008-01-09T13:52:26.025-05:00Hillary Clinton is Strong with the Dark Side<a href="https://blogger.googleusercontent.com/img/b/R29vZ2xl/AVvXsEiARIiPyeywN6S9rbsCYGmifPyIexdfqgi2JEnnpu0UMD5xALZYVZ7EBPgvdUEuwtedqKuOf_AKYtWgVJ4Y94dtn5vYgxpViNcqSG8Y6Y9fjMxBXM-oe6oTOfvCno46rGYPvv2gGl0UD2c/s1600-h/Join+Me+and+We+Can+Rule+Together.jpg"><img id="BLOGGER_PHOTO_ID_5153551206182884290" style="DISPLAY: block; MARGIN: 0px auto 10px; CURSOR: hand; TEXT-ALIGN: center" alt="" src="https://blogger.googleusercontent.com/img/b/R29vZ2xl/AVvXsEiARIiPyeywN6S9rbsCYGmifPyIexdfqgi2JEnnpu0UMD5xALZYVZ7EBPgvdUEuwtedqKuOf_AKYtWgVJ4Y94dtn5vYgxpViNcqSG8Y6Y9fjMxBXM-oe6oTOfvCno46rGYPvv2gGl0UD2c/s320/Join+Me+and+We+Can+Rule+Together.jpg" border="0" /></a><br /><div align="justify">Clinton down 14 points to Obama going into NH. Obama coming off a tremendous victory in Iowa. People calling him a phenomenon. Barak had it locked up. Or did he. </div><div align="justify"><br />I think that the huge discrepancy between the 8 polls from before the election, the exit poll and what ended up happening should give us all pause. The MSM was already writing the Clintons’ political obituary. Who would have said that would happen ever, considering the MSM love for all things Clinton?<br /><br />No one. Nobody saw it coming. But I think you can make a credible case that someone created and manipulated this situation. I think you can make a case for two people actually. Bill and Hillary.<br /><br />That’s right. This situation sure does have a tough time passing the smell test. The MSM were beating her down, she was tearing up, she needed to avoid the Obama Trap, her inevitability was gone, she was up against big momentum and she still won. It is a pretty big story to build on. Could it be the new centerpiece of her campaign? “I beat Obama, the phenomena…. Nothing can stop us…”<br /><br />Yes. I think that it could part of a set of potential plans all along. Lets think about this for a minute. Note that you have to assume that Bill and Hillary are as crafty and in control of the MSM as we think they are. Come along with me into the Democratic Machine as controlled by King Bill and Queen Hillary. Just play along; it will at least be plausible and entertaining.<br /><br />Clinton knew she was going to need a personality to help her with her lack of energy. She also needed a firewall to protect her from the new left wing Move on-ers, who could have taken over the party from her. She and Bill brought Obama into the ‘club’ in 2004 at the convention. You do not get that much MSM attention without the Clinton nod with little or no experience. She and Bill put him into storage for use later. </div><div align="justify"><br />Obama decided to run and see if his mojo would work and it did. He energized the youth of Iowa, (or had enough buses to bring in a lot of out of state supporters) to win. Hillary may have told him to run to get name recognition or as part of this plan but I doubt the latter) Hillary was in trouble. She went to Bill for help and he pulled his crafty tricks out and called for a meeting with Obama.<br /><br />At this meeting between Iowa and NH he was given a lesson of why he won Iowa and why he would lose NH. Hill told Obama that she controls the MSM and all the polling is way wrong on purpose. The MSM was giving Obama skewed results to show him in the lead by a lot when it was either really tied or Hillary was ahead. Hillary probably showed him real numbers. She showed little Barak that she really runs the democratic machine and she was grooming him as a potential VP who could shore up here negatives and guarantee the WH in 08. How else could someone with no accomplishments or experience who is NOT a Clinton get this far without help?<br /><br />If that didn’t get Obama to play ball, She then got the politics of personal destruction card out and slapped it on the table. Hannity alluded that the Clintons have really bad dirt (scandal) that will ruin Obama and are willing the use it. The dirt would stay sealed if Obama joined the team. A V.P. and then in 8 years he will be ready to go at POTUS. That’s when Hillary reached out her hand like Darth Vader and Said “ Join me and together we will rule the galaxy.” Will Obama pull a Skywalker and jump to freedom or will he join Hillary? Only time will tell. SC will give us our answer. </div><div align="justify"><br />Now sure I am playing it out like a dark and sinister conspiracy of hundreds perhaps thousands of people involved with the only goal being to get Hillary elected, but hey, that’s democratic politics. </div>Reagan Republicanhttp://www.blogger.com/profile/01918657498858395566noreply@blogger.com0tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-4001995614716850682.post-19419289629198479032007-12-15T13:23:00.000-05:002007-12-15T13:31:38.482-05:00Which one of these ladies look like they have an agenda?<a href="https://blogger.googleusercontent.com/img/b/R29vZ2xl/AVvXsEiHA6ZHGY5GGWfRMAssViI6qzkC7zwlNGxNu0QTrUczBTVM7uWf368K48PLPDPWrXXKGGqG1Mv6sYMK3BQngvQKplUE2HGKKve3IXfc091f9ibuF0cwI8UubNZebg_s962g8zbfeBf6oh4/s1600-h/15register-600.jpg"><img id="BLOGGER_PHOTO_ID_5144267286480229298" style="FLOAT: left; MARGIN: 0px 10px 10px 0px; CURSOR: hand" alt="" src="https://blogger.googleusercontent.com/img/b/R29vZ2xl/AVvXsEiHA6ZHGY5GGWfRMAssViI6qzkC7zwlNGxNu0QTrUczBTVM7uWf368K48PLPDPWrXXKGGqG1Mv6sYMK3BQngvQKplUE2HGKKve3IXfc091f9ibuF0cwI8UubNZebg_s962g8zbfeBf6oh4/s320/15register-600.jpg" border="0" /></a>Look at this picture, courtesy of Joshua Lott for The New York Times. It is the Editorial board for the The Des <span class="blsp-spelling-error" id="SPELLING_ERROR_0">Moines</span> Register. Laura <span class="blsp-spelling-error" id="SPELLING_ERROR_1">Hollingsworth</span>, left, Carolyn <span class="blsp-spelling-error" id="SPELLING_ERROR_2">Washburn</span> and Carol Hunter. Which one has a agenda other than <span class="blsp-spelling-error" id="SPELLING_ERROR_3">reporting</span>. That's right. It's like playing monkey in the middle. We might as <span class="blsp-spelling-error" id="SPELLING_ERROR_4">well</span> put Mrs <span class="blsp-spelling-error" id="SPELLING_ERROR_5">Washburn</span> in a Hillary T-Shirt. At least the other two smiled, or tried to smile. I think this picture is all you need to know. How much do you want to make a bet that the two ladies in front answer to <span class="blsp-spelling-error" id="SPELLING_ERROR_6">Washburn</span>? How much do you want to bet that they endorse Hillary and <span class="blsp-spelling-error" id="SPELLING_ERROR_7">Huckabee</span> tonight? There is a chance they endorse Fred, but I bet they will endorse whoever Hillary thinks she can beat. <div> </div><div>We will see,</div><div>RR<br /><br /></div><div></div>Reagan Republicanhttp://www.blogger.com/profile/01918657498858395566noreply@blogger.com0tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-4001995614716850682.post-70355628243849161372007-12-13T14:01:00.000-05:002007-12-14T07:46:55.081-05:00She's back! That may not good<a href="https://blogger.googleusercontent.com/img/b/R29vZ2xl/AVvXsEjs49UTdtA_grXO1LxoAGxpFAz_8PZ3UJDBRZNBBCPwJ5jfPlYgtp0SDIw7Iwlu0EHiCP3LHgtGPgH1uOjrabuMAlj81YnZ3SH3GJ2R8S1rmZJeR7sv9Qw-G-2MfF6zMT2gLeWRK8Rm4jc/s1600-h/WashburnCarolyn.jpeg"><img id="BLOGGER_PHOTO_ID_5143809129433863058" style="FLOAT: left; MARGIN: 0px 10px 10px 0px; CURSOR: hand" alt="" src="https://blogger.googleusercontent.com/img/b/R29vZ2xl/AVvXsEjs49UTdtA_grXO1LxoAGxpFAz_8PZ3UJDBRZNBBCPwJ5jfPlYgtp0SDIw7Iwlu0EHiCP3LHgtGPgH1uOjrabuMAlj81YnZ3SH3GJ2R8S1rmZJeR7sv9Qw-G-2MfF6zMT2gLeWRK8Rm4jc/s200/WashburnCarolyn.jpeg" border="0" /></a>Washburn is now grilling the Dems. Lets see if she is fair to the SIX of them.<br />NOT! It was just as bad for the Dems as the Reps, I think it may be her and her sense of importance. I am very dissapointed.<br />She did have more leeway with time with only six of them yet she seemed just as rushed. I think that Washburn is probably a moderate liberal that was doing her best to be fair and not cause any major flubs.<br />Shame.Reagan Republicanhttp://www.blogger.com/profile/01918657498858395566noreply@blogger.com0tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-4001995614716850682.post-81936025983355987582007-12-12T14:59:00.000-05:002007-12-13T13:56:04.544-05:00Iowa Debate - Who was the Winner?<div align="justify">RR's Thoughts on the Debate:<br /><br /><strong>Tancredo</strong> </div><div align="justify">Tom is really fabulous and he is targeted on two issues, illegal immigration and the war against islamofacists. It is too bad that he cannot win a general election.<br />Keyes The Ambassador really is a great speaker and he is clearly being insulted by a process that allows Paul to speak but not him. Not that Paul does not deserve to be there, he does. But Keys should be allowed to play up to a point (Till After NH.)<br /><br /><strong>Huckabee</strong> </div><div align="justify">He really stepped in it with his video statement regarding faith. Saying that a person stating he is a "person of faith, but it does not guide my decisions" is not really a person of faith. Huckbee is trying to twist and subtly attack Romney. I think Romney is on the high ground in this discussion and Huckabee really looks bad continuing to harp on this. The more he defines his candidacy on his religion and not being Mormon, takes away from his ability to show he has other issue based strengths for other voters who care less about what religion a leader is. I think that is his weakness here, he is a one point candidate (His Christianity) that sounds really good in sound bites,<br /><br /><strong>Thompson</strong><br />Fred was presidential and the winner of this debate. I am not saying this cause Fred is my guy. (I am not pulling a "KJL" like her support of Romney) I really think he won the debate. Too bad it was at 2 pm on a Wednesday. Fred really nailed why he should be president with this statement,<br /><br />"When the enemies of this country are at the negotiating table, who do you want representing you? Whoever that guy is, that's the guy you ought to vote for for President."<br /><br />He was also good putting down that liberal moderator, Carolyn Washburn, editor of the Des Moines Register. Thompson stuck it to he on the global warming-hand up moment.<br /><br />"I'm not doing any hand shows today."<br /><br /><strong>Washburn</strong><br />Washburn was a factor in the debate. Carolyn (I have heard he called Nurse Ratchet) should be led out back and told to walk into the corn field never to return. Or she should be checked to see if she was a Clinton plant ( My guess is that she is a big time liberal.) She did a disservice to the potential republican caucus goers by holding a debate whose main goal was to make the candidates look stupid. I think her questions, time limits (although justified) and overall inability to really bring issues out was disappointing. I am curious to see if she 1. is still moderating the dem debate today and 2. if she asks similar irrelevant questions in similar ways to the dems.<br /><br />I also thought her slam of the Republicans in the beginning of the debate was uncalled for. (Paraphrasing - the dems have debated a lot in Iowa, you haven't. So I am here to make you pay for that. WHAAA!!!!)<br /><br /><strong>McCain and Giuliani<br /></strong>These two were at the debate? I think they were effectively neutered at this event. The format did not suit them. I think they could have skipped it and gotten a bump from it.<br /><br /><strong>Romney</strong><br />Other than KJL's love for Romney as a candidate rubbing off at NRO and getting him their endorsement, There really was no true good or bad done to or by Romney in this Debate. He does benefit every time the Huckster takes a crack at Mormons.<br /><br />I bet today's debate will be very serious and will contrast well with the Repubs.<br /><br />Stay Tuned,</div><div align="justify">RR</div>Reagan Republicanhttp://www.blogger.com/profile/01918657498858395566noreply@blogger.com0tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-4001995614716850682.post-40203878148278392282007-12-12T13:17:00.000-05:002007-12-12T13:21:03.988-05:00Today at 2pm is the last chance for Fred (and McCain) to change this race in Iowa at the The Des Moines Register and Iowa Public Television Republican Debate. I will be listening and providing my comments later tonight. You too can listen <a href="http://www.c-span.org/radio/web/schedule.asp">here</a> at 2 pmReagan Republicanhttp://www.blogger.com/profile/01918657498858395566noreply@blogger.com0tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-4001995614716850682.post-87403963342174764072007-12-12T11:45:00.000-05:002007-12-12T12:59:28.261-05:00He did what? Huckmentum Strikes Again!<div align="justify"><a href="https://blogger.googleusercontent.com/img/b/R29vZ2xl/AVvXsEivJ5A7_g03gj24CmgIzkvVoKAzokfFx5WGr-sSHN86MVysw56G4RCISOfjs4n5wV905P_y3_DE7jmpuGkmP-ZWop2paDH9bRqKWIF6XAGSsc2zTqnxqxmkAiTrLbeqzEj-0mCTMI1ZF5s/s1600-h/images.jpeg"><img id="BLOGGER_PHOTO_ID_5143145822561416642" style="FLOAT: left; MARGIN: 0px 10px 10px 0px; CURSOR: hand" alt="" src="https://blogger.googleusercontent.com/img/b/R29vZ2xl/AVvXsEivJ5A7_g03gj24CmgIzkvVoKAzokfFx5WGr-sSHN86MVysw56G4RCISOfjs4n5wV905P_y3_DE7jmpuGkmP-ZWop2paDH9bRqKWIF6XAGSsc2zTqnxqxmkAiTrLbeqzEj-0mCTMI1ZF5s/s320/images.jpeg" border="0" /></a>Chuck Norris must be in charge of getting his endorsements. Mike <span class="blsp-spelling-error" id="SPELLING_ERROR_0">Huckabee</span>, who I believe cannot win the nomination <span class="blsp-spelling-corrected" id="SPELLING_ERROR_1">because</span> of his poor stance on border control and illegal immigration just got the endorsement of Jim Gilchrist, founder of the Minuteman Project. Read more <a href="http://michellemalkin.com/2007/12/11/minuteman-project-founder-endorses-huckabee/">here</a>. I am stunned. I guess that <span class="blsp-spelling-error" id="SPELLING_ERROR_2">Huckabee's</span> new plan for illegal immigration control must be really good. But it is a <span class="blsp-spelling-corrected" id="SPELLING_ERROR_3">definite</span> <span class="blsp-spelling-corrected" id="SPELLING_ERROR_4">flip</span>-flop. It is interesting that the position on illegal immigration did not change until he actually had a shot at winning. Now one must <span class="blsp-spelling-corrected" id="SPELLING_ERROR_5">gauge</span> the convictions and seriousness of the Huckster commitment to this plan or will he revert back to his old stance once in office. His past liberal tax policies can be forgiven if he seals the border and protects life. But he has a long record as <span class="blsp-spelling-corrected" id="SPELLING_ERROR_6">Governor</span> opposing employer sanctions and pushing tax-subsidized illegal alien education benefits. I will have to look into Mr. Gilchrist and his statement more.<br /><br />Stay Tuned,<br />RR</div>Reagan Republicanhttp://www.blogger.com/profile/01918657498858395566noreply@blogger.com0tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-4001995614716850682.post-63140893340857383532007-12-11T11:21:00.000-05:002007-12-11T13:03:27.751-05:00Filling the Void<div align="justify">Fred had finally woken up to the fact that he can't just waltz in the the nomination. Perhaps he has just been waiting for the Law and Order "<span class="blsp-spelling-error" id="SPELLING_ERROR_0">Dum</span>-<span class="blsp-spelling-error" id="SPELLING_ERROR_1">Dum</span>" sound to signal the kick off of his campaign. He is going to spend the next two weeks living and campaigning in Iowa It may be too late. </div><div align="justify"></div><div align="justify">Let's look at some of the numbers from <span class="blsp-spelling-error" id="SPELLING_ERROR_2">RCP</span>.</div><br />11/25 - 12/06 Iowa Caucus <span class="blsp-spelling-error" id="SPELLING_ERROR_3">RCP</span> Average<br /><span class="blsp-spelling-error" id="SPELLING_ERROR_4">Huckabee</span>- 29.6 Romney - 23.4 Thompson - 10.6<br />Giuliani - 10.4 McCain - 6.3 Paul - 5.0<br />Spread -- <span class="blsp-spelling-error" id="SPELLING_ERROR_5">Huckabee</span> +6.2<br /><br /><div align="justify">In Iowa, <span class="blsp-spelling-error" id="SPELLING_ERROR_6">Huckmentum</span>, the <span class="blsp-spelling-corrected" id="SPELLING_ERROR_7">corollary</span> to <span class="blsp-spelling-error" id="SPELLING_ERROR_8">Omentum</span> (Oprah/<span class="blsp-spelling-error" id="SPELLING_ERROR_9">Obama</span>), has taken hold. The reason seems clear, and it is not really encouraging. The religious right in Iowa has decided to reject Romney for the Huckster. His move up seems to be <span class="blsp-spelling-corrected" id="SPELLING_ERROR_10">occurring</span> right after he stressed his christian background, putting Romney's faith in the light. </div><div align="justify"></div><div align="justify">I do not agree that there should be a religious test for the nomination or to make you a conservative, but seemingly in Iowa, that is what is occurring. Huck is getting the majority of his support from evangelical <span class="blsp-spelling-corrected" id="SPELLING_ERROR_11">Christians</span>. From the <a href="http://caucuscooler.blogspot.com/2007/12/huckmentum.html">Caucus Cooler</a>...</div><div align="justify"></div><div align="justify"><blockquote>"Whether you like it or not (we don't) the guy playing the most important role in GOP primary right now died about 2000 years ago... You can't underestimate the strength of the evangelical block in IA, and they've found their man...And its going to be a tough thing for even the most boffo political organization to stop."</blockquote></div><div align="justify">I expect Huck to get brought down to earth before Christmas. Why? Because most people did not know anything about him. He was a blank state. He filled that conservative void that Fred was looking to fill. He may still win Iowa, but not at the margin he is at now. Why? <a href="http://www.arktimes.com/Articles/ArticleViewer.aspx?ArticleID=154e1aad-fd18-4efd-8d80-b5dab8559419">Wayne <span class="blsp-spelling-error" id="SPELLING_ERROR_12">Dumond</span></a>,<a href="http://www.newsweek.com/id/74469/page/7"> Tobacco Money Payments</a>, and his <a href="http://www.cnsnews.com/ViewPolitics.asp?Page=/Politics/archive/200712/POL20071204b.html">stance on immigration</a>.</div><div align="justify"></div><div align="justify">Fred has to step it up and come in second in Iowa or <span class="blsp-spelling-error" id="SPELLING_ERROR_13">Huckabee</span> needs to lose in Iowa. If neither happens, Fred has no shot in S.C. <span class="blsp-spelling-error" id="SPELLING_ERROR_14">Huckabee</span> can't win the nomination either, solely based on his immigration position. </div><div align="justify"></div><div align="justify">The <span class="blsp-spelling-error" id="SPELLING_ERROR_15">Dems</span> are very happy that Fred, McCain and <span class="blsp-spelling-error" id="SPELLING_ERROR_16">Guliani</span> are on the ropes. The media loves Huck. <span class="blsp-spelling-error" id="SPELLING_ERROR_17">Mmm</span> I wonder, do the <span class="blsp-spelling-error" id="SPELLING_ERROR_18">Dems</span> and media think that Huck would be good for them as a nominee? When you compare policy and position of Fred and <span class="blsp-spelling-error" id="SPELLING_ERROR_19">Huckabee</span>, Fred is the true heir to Reagan, but <span class="blsp-spelling-error" id="SPELLING_ERROR_20">Huckabee</span> comes off like Fred was supposed to, affable, quick, serious and approachable. If only Fred could take the void back from Huck.</div><div align="justify"></div><div align="justify"></div><div align="justify">Hillary is smiling....</div><div align="justify"> </div><div align="justify"> </div><div align="justify"> </div><div align="justify"></div><div align="justify">Stay Tuned,</div><div align="justify">RR</div><div align="justify"></div><div align="justify"></div>Reagan Republicanhttp://www.blogger.com/profile/01918657498858395566noreply@blogger.com0tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-4001995614716850682.post-16090298719773490142007-10-15T08:56:00.000-05:002007-10-15T08:58:45.462-05:00Reality has set in!The MSM is doing it's best to not give Fred coverage and make him out to be a lazy man. It is clear they want Rudy to win to split up the conservative vote. I just hope the ABH mentality takes over and puts a stop to the Hillary machineReagan Republicanhttp://www.blogger.com/profile/01918657498858395566noreply@blogger.com0tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-4001995614716850682.post-28082729541850824402007-06-26T10:00:00.000-05:002007-06-26T10:03:05.118-05:00It Moves Ever So Closer…<div align="justify">Of all the polls that I read at <span class="blsp-spelling-error" id="SPELLING_ERROR_0">RCP</span> (Real Clear Politics,) I have always thought that the Rasmussen poll was the most realistic and accurate. As time and the announcement on July 4<span class="blsp-spelling-error" id="SPELLING_ERROR_1">th</span> draws nearer, the <a href="http://www.rasmussenreports.com/public_content/politics/2008_republican_presidential_primary">polls</a> are reflecting what I have observed <span class="blsp-spelling-error" id="SPELLING_ERROR_2">anecdotally</span>. Fred Thompson is the front-runner for the GOP nomination.<br /><br />People that I live work and interact with on a regular basis have heard me talk about Fred. I have asked them what they think and they say the more they know about him the more they like him. Even the ones who do not like W right now, like Fred. I think existing candidates have not fired them up. Rudy <span class="blsp-spelling-error" id="SPELLING_ERROR_3">McRomney</span> has not excited the base. Mitt is really attractive as a candidate, the more I hear him the more I like him. Rudy is a one issue right, many others not-so strong candidate. McCain is out since Fred jumped in. (If McCain would have been leading or had a chance to win, Fred would not have run). This leave Thompson with a opportunity that many would dream of, stepping into the race on the top of the polls. <br /><br />Some say that after the shine leaves him after the announcement, Rudy will jump back on to. This may happen, but it is not likely. I believe there are a lot of GOP heavy hitters that are waiting for Fred to fully commit before they jump ship. I think this race for the GOP nomination will be over very quickly when Fred steps up. The second and third tier candidates will drop, McCain will leave gracefully, thanks to the Immigration (<span class="blsp-spelling-error" id="SPELLING_ERROR_4">Ahhhh</span>- Amnesty-<span class="blsp-spelling-error" id="SPELLING_ERROR_5">chooo</span>) bill he supports and that will leave Romney, Rudy and Fred.<br /><br />Romney has the financial advantage, but all from large donations. Small individual donations that signify grass roots support are not there. Mitt can stick around as long as he has money to do so, he will at least stay until after Iowa and NH since his whole plan revolves around decisive victories in those two spots that would spring him to the nomination. If Fred looks to be stealing these from him, he may stay in to see how it plays out. If Fred is second in either or wins both Romney is out, since Fred will win the big super primary with the heavily western and southern states in play. Romney has to win big in both and win one southern state to be in the game. <br /><br />Rudy is a whole other story. Fred’s entry into this race dooms his chance to win. Rudy needed to be the best alternative to the core of the conservative base to receive the nomination. Rudy clearly is right on defense, Iraq and perhaps immigration (I still have some sneaking doubts in Immigration with <span class="blsp-spelling-error" id="SPELLING_ERROR_6">RG</span>). But on most, if not all social issues I am out of step with him, in particular, on abortion. Rudy needed weaker opponents that him with similar flaws or more outside the GOP base. With <span class="blsp-spelling-error" id="SPELLING_ERROR_7">Mc</span>Cain and Romney, Rudy had it made. He could say, “If not me, who can…beat Hillary, keep you safe, lower your taxes??” Rudy would be the choice on the base conservative issues that are top of the list. With Fred in, people can say, Fred can do that, and he’s with us on abolishing abortion too.<br /><br />Fred now has to earn the nomination outright by filling the role we, as the grass roots effort that pulled him into the race, have created for him. His audition for the GOP candidate role has been completed. He now must fill the big role we have written for him and live up to our expectations. We have made him out to be greater than he probably is due to our longing for a Reagan-like man to lead us during this time of great challenges, both foreign and domestic. If he can just hold the public’s attention long enough to let the rest of the voters see the potential commander in chief, communicator and leader in him, it will be his nomination to lose.<br /><br />Stay tuned,<br /><br />RR</div>Reagan Republicanhttp://www.blogger.com/profile/01918657498858395566noreply@blogger.com2tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-4001995614716850682.post-36826781098555207902007-06-26T09:56:00.000-05:002007-06-26T09:59:50.688-05:00Lil’ Bush is Funny. Really.<div align="justify">There was Bush standing with his dad, talking with <span class="blsp-spelling-error" id="SPELLING_ERROR_0">Condoleezza</span>. “Hey let’s ask Cheney.” The camera panned and there’s Cheney standing next to his dad, who is wearing a Darth Vader Mask. I actually fell out of my chair and rolled on the floor laughing. It was so funny. Then the four friends Cheney, Bush, Rice and Rove went on a <span class="blsp-spelling-error" id="SPELLING_ERROR_1">panty</span> raid of an Al <span class="blsp-spelling-error" id="SPELLING_ERROR_2">Qaida</span> camp, stealing a pile of loincloths. Then the four put on the makeup and sang a rock song dressed up like KISS.<br /><br />I watched the Comedy Central show <a href="http://www.comedycentral.com/shows/lil_bush/index.jhtml">Lil’ Bush</a> the other night. And I loved it. The satire just oozed out of the show. First off, I support W big time and I only saw one episode. Now I <span class="blsp-spelling-error" id="SPELLING_ERROR_3">didn</span>’t agree that all of the shots taken by the creators were fair but it was funny nonetheless. They took some shots at the <span class="blsp-spelling-error" id="SPELLING_ERROR_4">Dems</span> too but most of the comedy was at the expense of W’s crew.<br /><br />I could have done without one piece though, the portrayal of <span class="blsp-spelling-error" id="SPELLING_ERROR_5">Jeb</span> as a dumb moron. I thought that was a little over the line, but the rest was fair game. <span class="blsp-spelling-error" id="SPELLING_ERROR_6">Jeb</span> being shown as he was outlines an unconscious fear of <span class="blsp-spelling-error" id="SPELLING_ERROR_7">Jeb</span> and his ability to become president. I know it’s a cartoon, but I think the creators really are trying to take a shot a <span class="blsp-spelling-error" id="SPELLING_ERROR_8">Jeb</span> to damage him, in a <span class="blsp-spelling-error" id="SPELLING_ERROR_9">cartoonish</span> sort of way. <br /><br />W and his crew can handle this. So can <span class="blsp-spelling-error" id="SPELLING_ERROR_10">Jeb</span>. There have been many incarnations of this on Comedy Central (That’s My Bush for example) I think W probably <span class="blsp-spelling-error" id="SPELLING_ERROR_11">doesn</span>’t like all of it, but he has a sense of humor enough to snicker at the cartoon versions of himself and his crew pelting <span class="blsp-spelling-error" id="SPELLING_ERROR_12">al</span> <span class="blsp-spelling-error" id="SPELLING_ERROR_13">Qaida</span> campers with water balloons.<br /><br />Could you imagine the outrage if this was reversed? How does Lil’ <span class="blsp-spelling-error" id="SPELLING_ERROR_14">Hil</span> sound? You’re probably offended already if you’re a democrat. You will never see Lil’ <span class="blsp-spelling-error" id="SPELLING_ERROR_15">Hil</span> though cause the democrats would never let it happen #1 and #2 it would not be funny. <br /><br />This is another example of the <span class="blsp-spelling-error" id="SPELLING_ERROR_16">Politainment</span> I have been talking about. I think it’s pretty effective. If you’re a <span class="blsp-spelling-error" id="SPELLING_ERROR_17">dem</span>, you like the portrayals of the <span class="blsp-spelling-error" id="SPELLING_ERROR_18">Bushies</span>, if you’re a <span class="blsp-spelling-error" id="SPELLING_ERROR_19">GOPer</span> you like Bush nuking all this things he <span class="blsp-spelling-error" id="SPELLING_ERROR_20">didn</span>’t like when his dad left him in the War Room. It had something for everyone. As long as they stay away from serious social topics ( like abortion), I will probably watch the show for an escape from the serious reality of today’s politics.<br /><br />Now if you had Lil’ Bill…I would pay money to see that. Could you imagine the <span class="blsp-spelling-corrected" id="SPELLING_ERROR_21">story lines</span> they could delve into? The FCC censors would probably have to take that off the air…<br /><br />Stay tuned,<br /><br />RR</div>Reagan Republicanhttp://www.blogger.com/profile/01918657498858395566noreply@blogger.com0tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-4001995614716850682.post-34459150808999471652007-06-26T09:51:00.000-05:002007-06-26T09:56:25.570-05:00Politainment: Hillary Soprano should sound an alarm<div align="justify">I think Hillary Clinton looked electable. I think she was very down to earth and really human. <br /><br />No don’t try to adjust your browser. This is still the RR doling out truth here. I am not suffering from a head injury or any other loss of my faculties. I am talking about the brilliant piece of Campaign media that Hillary 08 campaign put out the other day. <a href="http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=shKJk3Rph0E">Hillary’s Soprano spoof </a>with Bill’s cameo. It was fantastic. They did something that none of the other candidates, (save one) could do. They took a pop culture event, the Sopranos finale, and made it an endearing show of how Hillary and Bill are just two normal people. They used the new media machine to reach a whole new audience.<br /><br />I know it was Hillary and Bill re-enacting the final scene from the finale of Sopranos. I know it was heavily produced and planned. The real triumph here was that they were making fun of themselves a little bit, trying to be funny and most importantly, gave people a chance/reason to like them.<br /><br />They really took advantage of the <span class="blsp-spelling-error" id="SPELLING_ERROR_0">youtube</span> phenomena with this. A lot of people saw it. If the Hillary 08 team has more of these little vignettes in the hopper, they can be guaranteed some new voters and some old ones to at least take a look at what Hillary has to say. This should sound the alarm to the <span class="blsp-spelling-error" id="SPELLING_ERROR_1">Dems</span> and GOP that they better be prepared to respond in kind or be left behind by the Hillary machine.<br /><br />I <span class="blsp-spelling-error" id="SPELLING_ERROR_2">couldn</span>’t help think how disappointed viewers were with the end of the Sopranos finale. Bill and Hill took a risk with this spoof and I think it paid off. I believe that they learned this lesson from W. They learned that self-deprecation is good, in small funny doses, for a president to do. Just look at the funny little videos W has put out over the years.<br /><br />Just to make you feel better, the other candidate that can jump into this type of new media battle is evident <a href="http://www.breitbart.tv/?p=611">here</a> in his response to Michael Moore. Fred can play this <span class="blsp-spelling-error" id="SPELLING_ERROR_3">politainment</span> game too. Hey, I like that word I just made up. <span class="blsp-spelling-error" id="SPELLING_ERROR_4">Politainment</span> – the use of entertainment to reach/attain a political objective. Well then, if Hillary and Fred are the nominees, we will have our fill of <span class="blsp-spelling-error" id="SPELLING_ERROR_5">politainment</span> for the next 18 months.<br /><br />One last thing, I thought the carrot sticks for Bill were a nice touch too.<br /><br />Stay tuned,<br /><br />RR</div>Reagan Republicanhttp://www.blogger.com/profile/01918657498858395566noreply@blogger.com0tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-4001995614716850682.post-62359001174335265112007-06-26T09:50:00.000-05:002007-06-26T09:51:22.697-05:00Back in the GameI was gone for a while working hard at my job, but with school out that the summer ahead, it’s time to get back to the front. As they used to say, “Huzzah and onward.”<br /><br />Let us continue….<br /><br />Stay tuned,<br />RRReagan Republicanhttp://www.blogger.com/profile/01918657498858395566noreply@blogger.com0tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-4001995614716850682.post-5669083233687523612007-05-15T21:41:00.000-05:002007-05-15T21:55:32.596-05:00Proof of Qualification - Fred for President<div align="justify">Proof of Qualification - Fred for President. Fred Thompson will be the President of the U.S. Today, Michael Moore charged Fred as a hypocrite regarding trade policy and the embargo against Cuba for <span class="blsp-spelling-corrected" id="SPELLING_ERROR_0">having</span> cigars on his desk. Moore did this in this <a href="http://www.drudgereport.com/flash6.htm">letter.</a> If you have any doubt that Fred is not the man read that letter and then watch Fred's instant <span class="blsp-spelling-corrected" id="SPELLING_ERROR_1">response</span> to it <a href="http://www.breitbart.tv/?p=611">here</a>. <span class="blsp-spelling-corrected" id="SPELLING_ERROR_2">Fred</span> did this in like an hour <span class="blsp-spelling-error" id="SPELLING_ERROR_3">of </span>the letter being posted on the web. i envision Freed reading the letter online and then <span class="blsp-spelling-corrected" id="SPELLING_ERROR_4">asking</span> his staff to bring a <span class="blsp-spelling-corrected" id="SPELLING_ERROR_5">web cam</span> into the office to immediately tape his response. This proves the GRAVITAS that Fred bring to the table. He is head and shoulders above the <span class="blsp-spelling-corrected" id="SPELLING_ERROR_6">current</span> announced field. He would wipe the floor with all of them</div><div align="justify"> </div><div align="justify">I just got done watching tonight's debate too. Mitt sounds great. McCain still sounds like a liberal, Giuliani sounds like he's against abortion still. Mitt sounds like the most <span class="blsp-spelling-corrected" id="SPELLING_ERROR_7">Conservative</span> <span class="blsp-spelling-corrected" id="SPELLING_ERROR_8">candidate</span> in the top tier. He was impressive. McCain cannot win. He has Mr. <span class="blsp-spelling-error" id="SPELLING_ERROR_9">Roboto</span> arms. I know that's a negative but in the general, <span class="blsp-spelling-error" id="SPELLING_ERROR_10">Roboto</span> arms will be a deal breaker. Giuliani still supports abortion, so America will not be with him. Boy did Mitt zing them both. Hunter was awesome with his direct approach. <span class="blsp-spelling-error" id="SPELLING_ERROR_11">Tancredo</span> mentioned Jack Bauer, which is how all of us want to picture our real <span class="blsp-spelling-error" id="SPELLING_ERROR_12">CTU</span> working. </div><div align="justify"> </div><div align="justify">The truth is Fred would have OWNED that debate. When Fred gets in, all <span class="blsp-spelling-error" id="SPELLING_ERROR_13">of </span>the top <span class="blsp-spelling-corrected" id="SPELLING_ERROR_14">tier</span> <span class="blsp-spelling-error" id="SPELLING_ERROR_15">candidates</span> have to drop out <span class="blsp-spelling-corrected" id="SPELLING_ERROR_16">because</span> their ability to be an effective conservative voice disappears. Watch the video mentioned earlier again. That's our President talking....</div><div align="justify"> </div><div align="justify">Stay Tuned...</div><div align="justify">RR</div>Reagan Republicanhttp://www.blogger.com/profile/01918657498858395566noreply@blogger.com3tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-4001995614716850682.post-53765473696743586632007-04-18T20:48:00.000-05:002007-04-18T21:37:37.286-05:00A Horrible Similarity<div align="justify">The Virginia Tech Shootings are a tragedy. There is no way around that. What that kid did was unforgivable. It was scary to think that this can happen at our colleges. My prayers are with the victims and their families. </div><div align="justify"> </div><div align="justify">What is scarier is what came today. From <a href="javascript:CNN_openPopup(" toolbar="no,location=no,directories=no,status=no,menubar=no,scrollbars=no,resizable=no,width=770,height=576');"">CNN.com </a>...</div><div align="justify"><br /></div><blockquote><p align="justify">"A package mailed to NBC News by Virginia Tech killer <span class="blsp-spelling-error" id="SPELLING_ERROR_0">Cho</span> <span class="blsp-spelling-error" id="SPELLING_ERROR_1">Seung</span>-Hui contained disturbing video, writings and photographs of the troubled student. Authorities say <span class="blsp-spelling-error" id="SPELLING_ERROR_2">Cho</span> killed 32 people and then himself at the <span class="blsp-spelling-error" id="SPELLING_ERROR_3">Blacksburg</span>, Virginia, campus on Monday, April 16. The network reported the package was mailed at 9:01 am, between two shooting incidents and the photos show <span class="blsp-spelling-error" id="SPELLING_ERROR_4">Cho</span> handling the two handguns he used in the massacre. NBC News has given the material to investigators."</p></blockquote><div align="justify"><br /></div><div align="justify">These documents, pictures and especially the video remind me very clearly of one thing. The messages left behind by suicide bombers. This is a horrible coincidence. Or is it. I am not saying he was a terrorist or a <span class="blsp-spelling-error" id="SPELLING_ERROR_5">jihadist</span>, nor do I have any proof. His messages sure sound similar to what is left behind by the 'martyrs'. That similarity is chilling.</div><div align="justify"> </div><div align="justify">How many shootings by young men have taken place on college campuses in the last year. I can think of one in Minnesota and one in Montreal. I bet there are more. I am speculating that there are a lot of similar attacks like this, maybe not as large, but just similar in style.</div><div align="justify"> </div><div align="justify">It just occurred to me that this coincidence existed and I had to get it out there. <span class="blsp-spelling-error" id="SPELLING_ERROR_6">Cho</span> is, hopefully, just a insane maniac and not part of something larger. </div><br />Stay Tuned<br /><br />RRReagan Republicanhttp://www.blogger.com/profile/01918657498858395566noreply@blogger.com0tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-4001995614716850682.post-86355892407950417142007-04-11T21:39:00.000-05:002007-04-11T22:04:36.377-05:00Fred Thompson is Running for President<div align="justify">Fred Thompson announced today on various websites and during his commentary during the Paul Harvey Show that he was diagnosed two and a half years ago with an indolent lymphoma, a very treatable form of cancer. Since that diagnosis, he was treated for the cancer and is fully in remission. This type of cancer, if it returns, is extremely treatable and most people who do have it die of natural causes rather than from the lymphoma.<br /><br />Thompson is healthy and his prognosis is excellent. This type of cancer, from my discussions with those in the medical field, is a ‘good’ kind of cancer to get. It is almost ‘curable’ with drug treatments, especially with new drugs that are available. In all likelihood, Fred will live a long healthy life with this lymphoma never returning.<br /><br />This is a serious subject and should be treated as such. However, this announcement is very encouraging. This admission by Thompson of this condition is not just good because he is healthy; this is good because this is just another sign that Fred is running for president.<br /><br />Fred is vetting himself as a candidate with his own words, by his own hand, in venues of his own choosing. He is putting out the skeletons that he believes might derail a run before he announces just to make sure he can win if (when) he runs. He wants a fair shot at the White House. Fred wants to be the one setting the agenda for the media, not the other way around.<br /><br />Let me illustrate this point. Fred is a very smart man. I just got done watching Neil Cavuto’s interview with Fred on FNC. Cavuto was the perfect choice to air this topic since Cavuto himself is in remission of lymphoma-type cancer. Cavuto is also a very straight interviewer. His style of questioning fits Senator Thompson’s honest direct answers. Cavuto asked the right questions, giving Fred time and the ability to answer all the potential criticisms that Fred’s cancer announcement may raise.<br /><br />Lets look at the main potential hit Fred might face. Neil brought up the Tsongas question. In 1992, Paul Tsongas announced he was in remission from cancer (a more aggressive type of cancer) and shortly after lost support for his bid for the democratic nomination. Bill Clinton won and Tsongas cancer eventually returned. (I know some of you are thinking Clinton had something to do with the release of the Tsongas cancer information, but I don’t think so. I think Tsongas released that info because he thought he had it beat.) If Tsongas had been elected, he would have died in office.<br /><br />This is the one criticism that Fred will get from the MSM and the liberal operatives. Fred is sick, they will say. Fred cannot be trusted to make it through his presidency, they will charge. Fred easily countered this argument today. First. On his terms with Cavuto, he laid out that he is fine and produced a note from his doctor to prove it. (On a side, the doctor he has is a really, really good doctor.) The MSM will have a tough time creating doubt now on this issue. </div><div align="justify"></div><div align="justify">Unfortunately, he is not the only candidate that has cancer as a potential issue. McCain, Giuliani and Edwards are dealing or have dealt with cancer. If Fred were the only one, I would say it was a potential issue. With Fred joining three main candidates in this, I think he will be ok.<br /><br />Neil also brought up the question about why Fred released this information now. Fred responded, correctly, that the American people needed to know about this. Fred said he would judge their response and weigh it in his decision to run or not. He mentioned checklists he was working though in this process and how they were really small issues. From the <a href="http://www.foxnews.com/story/0,2933,265271,00.html">interview</a>...</div><div align="justify"></div><blockquote><p align="justify">"The American people have a right to know this. And they have a right to voice their opinions whether they think it's a big deal or not. And I know it's not a big deal as far as my health is concerned, as much as a person can know things like that. But other people have a right to look at it and weigh in and I have a need to factor that into my decision in terms of the reaction I get of that," he <em>(Thompson)</em> said.</p></blockquote><div align="justify">Cavuto used this to chance to get more info on Fred decision process. That is exactly what Fred wanted. This interview will stoke the already burning fire for Fred’s candidacy into an inferno. People will be moving to his camp now more than ever. Neil helped by asking about money too, how Fred was already way behind. Fred looked like he knew something that the rest of us didn’t. I got the feeling that he knows that if he gets in the race, he will have all the money he need. He said the right thing too, (paraphrasing) 'It’s not about how much you have, it is all about the trust the American people have in you leading the country. If you have that, the money will come.'<br /><br />Today we have seen the strongest indications that Fred is running for President. I think he is running for sure now. He is setting the tone, insolating himself from attacks and setting up his campaign as the right man for today’s world. Another candidate did this exact process as well. Back in 1979, and we all know how great that turned out. </div>Reagan Republicanhttp://www.blogger.com/profile/01918657498858395566noreply@blogger.com0tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-4001995614716850682.post-37487627279057722232007-04-04T20:45:00.000-05:002007-04-04T21:06:47.574-05:00Giuliani May Have Taken Himself Out. The Pitfalls of the Early Election Cycle<a href="https://blogger.googleusercontent.com/img/b/R29vZ2xl/AVvXsEgyBaFrRNeNtQ_VyhBFfFN_o0SO2gulhnI9urMlRDbOceldR7Iv2l2x2WdEPLnECBFaa_xU2VUuu0ytu5oVHGOrJQNfX34Qn4Z3NtMUHUSDGzGQ4JyrRVhMkkjl0ZkYQ66SuZsI3r1DUD4/s1600-h/stories_giuliani_iowa.jpg"><img id="BLOGGER_PHOTO_ID_5049759524698924226" style="FLOAT: left; MARGIN: 0px 10px 10px 0px; CURSOR: hand" alt="" src="https://blogger.googleusercontent.com/img/b/R29vZ2xl/AVvXsEgyBaFrRNeNtQ_VyhBFfFN_o0SO2gulhnI9urMlRDbOceldR7Iv2l2x2WdEPLnECBFaa_xU2VUuu0ytu5oVHGOrJQNfX34Qn4Z3NtMUHUSDGzGQ4JyrRVhMkkjl0ZkYQ66SuZsI3r1DUD4/s200/stories_giuliani_iowa.jpg" border="0" /></a> With Mr. Giuliani's <a href="http://www.cnn.com/POLITICS/blogs/politicalticker/">statement today confirming his support of taxpayer funded abortions</a>, he has shown social conservatives, pro-life republicans and independents that he is not the candidate for them. This is exactly why conservatives were worried about Rudy. Figures that he would make this statement on CNN (<a href="http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=QZe1j4csMq8">Video</a>). This statement will get a lot of play in the next month or so and will probably eliminate his front runner status, perhaps knocking him out the top tier entirely.<br /><br /><div align="justify">I, in good conscience, could not vote for him now in the primary. I think a lot of his support will move to someone else, Romney or Fred. Most likely Fred.<br /></div><div align="justify">But this brings up something else. As this gaffe by Rudy during a set up during a CNN interview illustrates, this early extended election cycle only benefits the democrats. The MSM now has almost 2 years to dig up dirt, try to get candidates to make mistakes, and document wrongdoings before the election. The MSM will only really go after Republicans to try to weaken them in the eyes of independents and moderate republicans. Yes Hillary is also hurt by the length of time she is exposed, but the MSM will cover for her the best they can. (The more you get to know Hillary, the harder she is to take.)<br /></div><div align="justify">This early election cycle gives the MSM time to stockpile ammunition and take more shots at our candidates. This is why Fred and Newt look very wise, trying to wait it out as long as they can. Maybe they are waiting to see which of the big three are left by August to decide whether or not to get in. One thing is for sure now. Unless Giuliani pulls himself out of this quagmire,(yes I used the Q word- I better credit Kerry for it's use) and pull himself out quick, he won't be around in August.</div><br /><div align="justify">Stay Tuned<br /></div><div align="justify">RR</div>Reagan Republicanhttp://www.blogger.com/profile/01918657498858395566noreply@blogger.com1tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-4001995614716850682.post-90941170638198549492007-04-03T20:58:00.000-05:002007-04-03T21:23:03.484-05:00Pelosi, there you go again...<a href="https://blogger.googleusercontent.com/img/b/R29vZ2xl/AVvXsEjLAstK4Jeaxs4wo7EOn4UifQ5EqSfVFocEK4qKvEcVd2MB_jHg7pohyphenhyphen-3AjAWjYFUTMJQq3d65qBbu8Ms1XNC41bZ1bL3vDtQyQIiWkOgvwKGI3Qnoz6w8TIOW-Qa3ec4Gi_OFUOM7Mck/s1600-h/capt_xhm10204031738_mideast_syria_us_pelosi_xhm102.jpg"><img id="BLOGGER_PHOTO_ID_5049387735149913266" style="DISPLAY: block; MARGIN: 0px auto 10px; CURSOR: hand; TEXT-ALIGN: center" alt="" src="https://blogger.googleusercontent.com/img/b/R29vZ2xl/AVvXsEjLAstK4Jeaxs4wo7EOn4UifQ5EqSfVFocEK4qKvEcVd2MB_jHg7pohyphenhyphen-3AjAWjYFUTMJQq3d65qBbu8Ms1XNC41bZ1bL3vDtQyQIiWkOgvwKGI3Qnoz6w8TIOW-Qa3ec4Gi_OFUOM7Mck/s320/capt_xhm10204031738_mideast_syria_us_pelosi_xhm102.jpg" border="0" /></a>This picture shows why the Democrats are really not on our side. I think it speaks volumes.<br /><br />Yes, she was going into a mosque. Yes, she was a guest of Syria. Yes, you could say she was being diplomatic. There is a lot to be said for respecting another's culture in their lands.<br /><br />There is, however, a tenant of liberal doctrine that she is breaking. Democrats preach tolerance and acceptance of other people's beliefs and their right to exist. They believe that others should be allowed to practice what they want with no fear of retribution or discrimination.<br /><br />Unless you are in a country deemed a supporter of terrorism. Then, as Nancy Pelosi showed, you must give your rights to practice what you believe and bow to their intolerance. <br /><br />She put on a scarf/hijab during parts of her trip to Syria as to conform to the Baathist regime and the Islamic elements. She conformed to them because they would be offended if she didn't. Why can't Nancy ask them to respect her position as an American woman and let her go without covering her head? Why not ask them to be tolerant? Why not ask them to be respectful of the office of the Speaker of the House???<br /><br />Why? Because that is not why she is there. She is not there to fact find. She is there to show them solidarity in their struggle against W. She is there to reassure them that the US is on their way out of Iraq and the Syrians have nothing to worry about.<br /><br />Look at this from <a href="http://www.breitbart.com/article.php?id=D8O98BJG0&show_article=1">Breitbart</a>...<br /><blockquote>'Syria treated the visit as a diplomatic victory. State-run newspapers published news of Pelosi's trip on their front pages, with one daily publishing a photograph of Pelosi next to the headline: "Welcome Dialogue."<br />But there were some warnings against high expectations.<br />Syria's ambassador to the United States, <a title="" style="TEXT-DECORATION: underline" href="http://search.breitbart.com/q?s=%22Imad+Moustapha%22&sid=breitbart.com" relidx="1">Imad Moustapha</a>, described the visit as a "positive step" but said "it does not necessarily mean that the Bush administration would suddenly change its position" from Syria.<br />In comments to the state-run Al-Thawra daily published Tuesday, he said the visit should be a "reminder that even though we might disagree on politics, we should remain diplomatically engaged in dialogue to reach some understandings."<br />Pelosi is traveling with a delegation of U.S. lawmakers, including the first Muslim member of Congress, Keith Ellison, D-Minn.<br />In Israel, Pelosi said she would tell Syrian leaders that Israel will talk peace with them only if Syria stops supporting <a title="" style="TEXT-DECORATION: underline" href="http://search.breitbart.com/q?s=%22Palestinian+militants%22&sid=breitbart.com" relidx="7">Palestinian militants</a>. She has said she will also talk to the Syrians about Iraq, their role in neighboring Lebanon and their support for Lebanon's Hezbollah militants. '</blockquote><br />Pelosi went over there to say, 'We are with you. And soon, so will the new president. So just hold on. Help is on the way' I thought that only the president and his administration can conduct matters of foreign affairs. <br /><br />These are just my thoughts on this, don't get me started on Pelosi and Reid's move to cut funding...<br /><br />Stay Tuned<br /><br />RR<br /><br />(Picture from <a href="http://www.drudgereport.com/">Drudge</a>)Reagan Republicanhttp://www.blogger.com/profile/01918657498858395566noreply@blogger.com2tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-4001995614716850682.post-13543355003629684232007-03-27T20:54:00.000-05:002007-03-27T21:11:45.644-05:00Tony Snow<div align="justify">As you have probably have heard, Tony Snow is once again battling cancer. My family's prayers are with him and his family for his speedy, successful recovery. </div><div align="justify"> </div><div align="justify">I think Tony Snow is a truly honorable man who is following his heart and serving his country, doing his best for what he believes in. I have always thought that his time at the White house has been a real open insight into the working of Bush's policy. I think he is great.</div><div align="justify"> </div><div align="justify">He will beat this. He has a lot more good work to do for himself, his family and America. </div><br />RRReagan Republicanhttp://www.blogger.com/profile/01918657498858395566noreply@blogger.com1tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-4001995614716850682.post-18009804294553570092007-03-26T21:33:00.000-05:002007-03-27T20:52:32.300-05:00The Fifth at the Halls of Justice.<div align="justify">With Monica <span class="blsp-spelling-error" id="SPELLING_ERROR_0">Goodling</span> taking "The Fifth" when she goes to senate hearings, I sense no good outcome for Alberto Gonzalez. I think he is in political trouble. I think that Deputy Attorney General Paul <span class="blsp-spelling-error" id="SPELLING_ERROR_1">McNulty</span> is out to get him. I think he decided that he wanted to be AG and set about to get the job. There is no actual wrongdoing, from what I have seen so far but Al Gonzalez is going to get whacked by politics here pure and simple.</div><div align="justify"></div><div align="justify">That isn't what is so fascinating here however. It is the strategy that <span class="blsp-spelling-error" id="SPELLING_ERROR_2">Goodling's</span> lawyer, John <span class="blsp-spelling-error" id="SPELLING_ERROR_3">Dowd</span>, is implementing here. If I was being investigated by the democrats, I think I might want this guy on my legal team. Here is what he said...</div><div align="justify"></div><blockquote><p align="justify">"The potential for legal jeopardy for Ms. <span class="blsp-spelling-error" id="SPELLING_ERROR_4">Goodling</span> from<br />even her most truthful and accurate testimony under these circumstances is very<br />real," said the lawyer, John <span class="blsp-spelling-error" id="SPELLING_ERROR_5">Dowd</span>.<br />"One need look no further than the recent<br />circumstances and proceedings involving Lewis Libby," he said, a reference to<br />the recent conviction of Vice President Dick Cheney's former chief of staff in<br />the CIA leak case."</p></blockquote><div align="justify"></div><div align="justify">Did you catch that. <span class="blsp-spelling-error" id="SPELLING_ERROR_6">Dowd</span> is saying, very clearly, that his client can't testify at all without the potential for her to incriminate herself. I do not think he thinks she has done anything illegal, just that the potential for incriminating oneself in testimony is a great risk to his client. Still don't follow....</div><div align="justify"><span style="font-size:0;"><span style="font-size:0;"><span style="font-size:0;"><span style="font-size:0;"></span></span></span></span></div><div align="justify">Why is it such a risk to talk to the Senate subcommittee? <span class="blsp-spelling-error" id="SPELLING_ERROR_7">Dowd</span> has looked at the Libby case and sees Libby did not break any laws in his actions. He correctly sees that Libby was 'hung' because his recollection of events was different that <span class="blsp-spelling-error" id="SPELLING_ERROR_8">Russert's</span> recollection of events. This became a procedural act, not a substantive act. If Libby took the Fifth in the grand jury and kept his mouth shut, he would not have made statements that would have conflicted with <span class="blsp-spelling-error" id="SPELLING_ERROR_9">Russert's</span>. And since no one committed a crime in the 'outing' of Valerie <span class="blsp-spelling-error" id="SPELLING_ERROR_10">Plame</span>, Fitzgerald would have had no one to prosecute and it all goes away.</div><div align="justify"></div><div align="justify"><span class="blsp-spelling-error" id="SPELLING_ERROR_11">Goodling's</span> attorney is saying that the potential for being challenged procedurally, with perjury or similar infraction, is possible when going in front of the current Senate Subcommittee. Even if she tells the truth and has video of her entire life like a reality show, she could be called out on any misstep by the current congressional majority. Because of this risk, He has come up with a valid reason , correctly, I might add, to take the fifth. </div><div align="justify"></div><div align="justify">Even if she did do something wrong, will never know now. Thanks Fitzgerald.</div><br />Stay Tuned<br /><br />RRReagan Republicanhttp://www.blogger.com/profile/01918657498858395566noreply@blogger.com2tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-4001995614716850682.post-49869783603157012342007-03-26T21:14:00.000-05:002007-03-26T21:33:51.670-05:00Fred's Boss says he can win, plus the first polls of spring...<div align="justify">Each day that goes by, May is closer and so is Fred announcement to seek the presidency. Here are just a few of the morsels I have been savoring today.</div><div align="justify"> </div><div align="justify">When your wife tells you to do something, you better do it. I feel a whole lot better now that I know that <a href="http://www.nationalledger.com/artman/publish/article_272612297.shtml">Fred's wife is telling him to run</a>. </div><div align="justify"> </div><div align="justify"> A lot of initial polling out there done by reputable firms have Thompson in this race before he even officially announces he is in. This <a href="http://www.newsmax.com/archives/ic/2007/3/25/145319.shtml">article </a>talks about how he's already tied with Hillary. </div><div align="justify"> </div><div align="justify"><a href="http://www.ajc.com/metro/content/shared-blogs/ajc/politicalinsider/entries/2007/03/24/in_gwinnett_fred_thompson_gets.html">Another straw poll</a> of a few counties in Georgia show how strong Fred would be in the south. He would clean up.</div><div align="justify"> </div><div align="justify">In Ohio, with no infrastructure or organization, <a href="http://www.ohio.com/mld/beaconjournal/16970414.htm">Fred is in a strong third </a>behind Giuliani and McCain.</div><div align="justify"> </div><div align="justify">Again the Pundits are starting to see <a href="http://www.ocala.com/apps/pbcs.dll/article?AID=/20070325/OPINION/203250337/1030/OPINION">Fred as the man to win in 08</a>. My favorite has to be <a href="http://powerlineblog.com/archives/017150.php">Paul Mirengoff 's Powerline piece</a>.</div><div align="justify"> </div><div align="justify">And I will speak to this rumor that Fred is being groomed to take Cheney's place...as soon as I find out more about this from McLaughlin</div><div align="justify"> </div><div align="justify">Stay Tuned</div><div align="justify"> </div><div align="justify">RR</div>Reagan Republicanhttp://www.blogger.com/profile/01918657498858395566noreply@blogger.com0